Resilient Housing Initiative

How can zoning reform support environmental justice populations in the Metro Boston Area?
History of Zoning in the MAPC Region
1920
Racially restrictive covenants (1920s-1968)
Racially restrictive covenants (1920s-1968)
Racially restrictive covenants (1920s-1968) are the contractual agreements that prohibit the purchase, lease, or occupation of property of a specific racial group, particularly Black Americans. Even after covenants were no longer legally sanctioned, residentials patterns created by the covenants greater lasting systemic exclusion of Non-White residents
Institutional redlining (1934-1968)
1934
Institutional redlining (1934-1968)
The Federal Housing Administration institutionalized racism by utilizing redlining (1934-1968) for mortgage insurance requirements. Redlining involved denying or restricting financial services to specific neighborhoods based on race or ethnicity regardless of residents creditworthiness.
1968
suburban zoning policies (1968-Present)
suburban zoning policies (1968-Present)
Since the 1970s, suburban zoning policies have worsened racial and socioeconomic segregation, with regulations like large lot requirements and minimum multifamily zoning excluding lower-income families and people of color. Originally aimed at controlling density and inflating housing prices, these rules persist today, limiting affordability and rental options, particularly for African American and Latino communities and family households.

This analysis shows a clear negative correlation between the presence of EJ populations and single-family housing. Combined with the majority of housing being devoted to single-family residences, this makes housing especially precarious for these vulnerable populations.

Explore 4 MAPC Municipalities

The following visualizations illustrate the relationship between single-family zoning, parcels data, and environmental justice populations in four different municipalities in the MAPC region.

Left Image
Right Image
MAPC region. To do further exploration please select one of the highlighted municipalities.
Cambridge is labeled as a 0% single-family municipality, but it actually has numerous single-family parcels, especially around Harvard, where there are no environmental justice populations. However, Cambridge does have a substantial environmental justice population compared to municipalities with single-family zoning.

Based on this analysis a main takeaway is that most of the environmental justice populations are concentrated where there are not a lot of single family zoning and single family residence. To better support the environmental justice population we can create zoning reforms. There is an immediate need for changing the zoning from single family zoning to include “missing middle” types of housing and also allowing accessory dwelling units (ADUs) to be built in places where single family houses have already been built. ADUs are smaller, independent residential units that are located on the same parcel as the single family home but it is detached from the house. This can increase the supply of housing and meet the demand of the people as well as increase housing affordability in the MAPC region.

Explore Environmental Justice and Single Family Zoning Relationship in MAPC Region

The relationship between single family zoning and environmental justice populations in the MAPC region can be explored by looking more closely at all the different municipalities through the interactive maps below.

Datasets

Sources

Acknowledgments

This project was developed with guidance and feedback from the Metropolitan Area Planning Commission (MAPC).

Authors